Comparing Wide-Angle Lenses for Landscape Photography
gearlensescomparisonnightscape

Comparing Wide-Angle Lenses for Landscape Photography

DDmitri Kovacs
2026-01-05
13 min read
Advertisement

We compare five popular wide-angle lenses across sharpness, coma, flare, and build quality — practical results from mountain, coastal, and forest shoots.

Comparing Wide-Angle Lenses for Landscape Photography

Wide-angle lenses are the workhorses of landscape photographers. They allow you to include foreground context and emphasize scale. For this comparison we tested a selection of fast and moderately priced wide-angle lenses across varied conditions: low light, backlit scenes, and edge-to-edge detail. Our aim was to translate lab and field results into meaningful advice.

The contenders

  • Lens A: 16–35mm f/4 — lightweight zoom
  • Lens B: 14mm prime f/2.8 — ultra-wide prime
  • Lens C: 18mm prime f/2.0 — compact and sharp
  • Lens D: 24–70mm wide setting — versatile zoom
  • Lens E: 15–30mm f/4 — heavy-duty pro zoom

Sharpness and edge control

In the center, all lenses produced excellent files at f/8–f/11. Differences emerged at the corners and wide-open apertures. The ultra-wide prime (Lens B) showed consistent microcontrast but needed stopping down to f/5.6 for edge clarity on full-frame sensors. The compact prime (Lens C) surprised with very high center sharpness even wide open, making it ideal for handheld dawn shoots.

Astigmatism and coma for nightscapes

Astigmatism and coma are important for star work. Lens B again performed well, but Lens C had the least star elongation toward the edges, making it a strong candidate for milky way work. The heavy pro zoom (Lens E) required correction at the extreme corners for star shapes, though its central performance remained excellent.

Flare and contrast in backlight

Backlit scenarios revealed coating differences. Lens A and Lens D handled flare gracefully with controlled artifacts, while Lens B produced more visible coma-style streaks when the sun intruded into the frame. Use lens hoods and careful composition to mitigate flare when shooting toward strong light sources.

Build and handling

If you hike long distances, weight matters. Lens C and Lens A are the most packable, while Lens E is robust but heavy. Weather sealing on Lens E and Lens D gives confidence in wet environments; if you shoot coastal or alpine scenes frequently, a weather-sealed option is worth the weight penalty.

Value and intended use

  • Best ultralight travel: Lens C — compact with high center sharpness for dawn handholds.
  • Best nightscape: Lens C or Lens B — low coma across much of the frame when stopped down slightly.
  • Best pro all-rounder: Lens E — consistent across a range of conditions with weather sealing.

Performance scores (summary)

  • Lens A: Sharpness 85, Flare resistance 88, Portability 92
  • Lens B: Sharpness 90, Flare resistance 75, Portability 78
  • Lens C: Sharpness 93, Flare resistance 86, Portability 95
  • Lens D: Sharpness 87, Flare resistance 90, Portability 83
  • Lens E: Sharpness 91, Flare resistance 89, Portability 70

Practical recommendation

Choose based on your priorities. If you prioritize low weight and frequent handheld shooting, Lens C is a standout. If you need weather protection and consistent performance under varied professional use, consider Lens E. Price-sensitive shooters who want flexibility will find Lens A an excellent balance.

"No single lens is perfect for every place — the right tool aligns with how and where you shoot."
Advertisement

Related Topics

#gear#lenses#comparison#nightscape
D

Dmitri Kovacs

Technical Editor

Senior editor and content strategist. Writing about technology, design, and the future of digital media. Follow along for deep dives into the industry's moving parts.

Advertisement